TikTok has submitted its opening brief in its legal fight to remain in the U.S., arguing that the government's ban on the app violates the First Amendment right to free speech. It has also explained why divestment from Chinese parent company ByteDance simply isn't possible "technologically, commercially, and legally."
Filed to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals on Thursday, TikTok's 99-page filing calls for a review of the constitutionality of the Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA), which was signed into law by President Joe Biden in April.
SEE ALSO:TikTok child privacy complaint sent to U.S. Dept. of JusticeThe legislation introduces a U.S. ban on "foreign adversary controlled applications," and specifically includes both TikTok and ByteDance by name. The companies have consistently maintained that they are independent of the Chinese government and have not furnished it with Americans' data.
"Never before has Congress silenced so much speech in a single act," TikTok's filing alleges. "The Act is unconstitutional and must be enjoined."
In the filing, TikTok notes that laws which restrict free speech are subject to "strict scrutiny." Under this standard, the U.S. government must prove the legislation is narrowly tailored to advance a compelling governmental interest, and that said law is the least restrictive way this objective can be achieved.
Basically, the government can't bluntly bulldoze free speech to achieve its goals when a surgical strike would suffice.
TikTok argues that Congress has failed to meet this requirement, as it did not consider less restrictive alternatives before passing a law to ban the app. Such options allegedly included a 90-page National Security Agreement that TikTok negotiated with the U.S. government, which featured "multi-layered safeguards and enforcement mechanisms." Project Texas, TikTok's $2 billion effort to wall off U.S. users' data, was allegedly the company's effort to start implementing parts of the agreement prior to it being finalised.
"The Act cannot survive First Amendment scrutiny at any step of the analysis: it advances no compelling interests, is not tailored, and disregards less restrictive alternatives," TikTok's filing reads.
"There is no indication Congress even considered TikTok Inc.’s exhaustive, multi-year efforts to address the government’s concerns that Chinese subsidiaries of its privately owned parent company, ByteDance Ltd., support the TikTok platform — concerns that would also apply to many other companies operating in China."
TikTok further objected to PAFACA's "two-tiered system of speech regulation" which it claims unfairly singles the company out. Noting that the legislation automatically considers an app to be "foreign adversary controlled" if it operated by ByteDance or TikTok, the filing alleges that the law imposes "one standard for TikTok and a different standard for everyone else."
Last year TikTok successfully fought off a ban in Montana, a judge finding the law unconstitutional on the basis that it restricted free speech and imposed a punishment on the company without a trial.
Thursday's filing also addressed claims that the ban isn't really a ban because ByteDance could just sell TikTok to a corporation the U.S. approves of. According to TikTok, such divestment within the time frame imposed cannot practically be done within the timeframe afforded to them. The ban is currently scheduled to go into effect on Jan. 19 next year, nine months after the bill was signed.
"Executing a 'qualified divestiture' is technologically, commercially, and legally infeasible, particularly on the Act’s timeframe of 270 days (or 360 days with a discretionary extension)," wrote TikTok, adding that it has "repeatedly" explained this to the government. "The effect of the Act is therefore a ban."
Even if divestment from ByteDance was possible, Thursday's briefing claimed such a move would transform TikTok in the U.S. into "a shell of its former self."
According to TikTok, the app runs on "billions of lines of code" which are developed and maintained by thousands of employees across the globe. Divestment would require new engineers to be adequately trained in said code, the company said, a process which would likely take years. Further, TikTok uses custom ByteDance software tools — tools which the new legislation would prohibit it from accessing once divested.
Even if divestment from ByteDance was possible, Thursday's briefing claimed such a move would transform TikTok in the U.S. into "a shell of its former self." A U.S.-exclusive TikTok would need to be separated and isolated from all other users across the globe, making it much less engaging and significantly decreasing its commercial value.
Finally, TikTok stated that it cannot legally pursue a sale because the Chinese government will not allow a forced divestment of the app's recommendation engine.
"Just as the United States restricts the export of U.S.-origin technologies (e.g., certain computer chips), the Chinese government regulates the transfer of technologies developed in China," reads the briefing. The U.S. has prohibited the sale of computing chips to companies in China, including advanced AI chips.
TikTok declined to comment further when reached by Mashable.
It will be a while before we find out the result of TikTok's legal challenge. Oral arguments are currently scheduled to be held in three months on Sept. 16, four months before the ban is set to come into effect.
The U.S. TikTok ban follows ongoing concern from lawmakers that the Chinese government is covertly spying on users through the popular app, as well as manipulating its algorithm to show China in a favourable light. No public evidence has yet been produced to prove this is actually happening. Senators have also accused TikTok of deliberately promoting support for Palestine to young people in order to cause societal division in the U.S.
If TikTok's challenge fails, PAFACA could fine the company up to $5,000 for each U.S. user. TikTok has 170 million users in the U.S. (which hypocritically includes both President Biden and former president Donald Trump), meaning it could be hit with a whopping fine of approximately $850 billion if it continues to operate in the country. ByteDance was valued at $223 billion last October.
UPDATE: Jul. 1, 2024, 10:22 a.m. AEST This article has been updated with TikTok's response to Mashable's request for comment.
TopicsTikTok
(责任编辑：休閑)
Dog elected for third term as mayor of Minnesota town
Hopefully he has a human chief of staff. 。Duke the Great Pyrenees is the only dog that's ever been el
...[详细]
女孩頭皮上麵有白色顆粒，這多半就是由於頭皮屑 ，其實這種情況幾乎每個人都是會出現 ，隻是有些人們出現的情況就會非常的明顯 ，不單單是會影響到整體的美觀性
，還會導致患者感覺到特別的沒有自信心
，所以說還是應該要
...[详细]
土蜂蜜在平時也被叫做是野蜂蜜 ，土蜂蜜一般是采用很多種花釀製而成的 ，營養物質和其他的蜂蜜相比較，在平時更受到大家的歡迎
，土蜂蜜在產量是非常低的，非常的珍貴 ，食用之後對人身體健康是很有好處的 ，是一種很常見
...[详细]
每一個人每天都會排尿
，這是我們身體正常運轉必須要經過的一個過程。很多人表示最討厭的就是尿液
，認為尿液非常的惡心 ，非常的髒，其實從醫學上來講，尿液真的會非常的重要 。因為大多數時候 ，人體如果是泌尿係統或者
...[详细]PlayStation Now game streaming is coming to PC
Sony's PlayStation Now service is launching for Windows PC, meaning subscribers will soon be able to
...[详细]
海參在選購的問題上麵很多人們都不是很了解
，每次選購海參的時候都是會變得很生疏
，這樣選購的海參就不是很新鮮，甚至是分不清幾種不同類型的海參 ，其實還是應該要選擇顏色上麵更加濃厚的海參
，這種海參就會變得更加
...[详细]
現如今人們的交通是很便利的，出門都可以做火車、坐飛機、坐高鐵等等 ，高鐵因為其速度快並且價格合適而很受人歡迎 ，而坐高鐵是有很多注意事項的 ，比如不能攜帶易燃易爆物品、不能帶寵物等等。有些家長想要帶著嬰兒坐
...[详细]女孩頭皮上麵有白色顆粒 ，這多半就是由於頭皮屑 ，其實這種情況幾乎每個人都是會出現 ，隻是有些人們出現的情況就會非常的明顯 ，不單單是會影響到整體的美觀性 ，還會導致患者感覺到特別的沒有自信心 ，所以說還是應該要
...[详细]There's a big piece of fake chicken stuck to this phone case
If the perfect smartphone case signals a bit about who its owner is, then this silicon fried chicken
...[详细]
女性要正常懷孕的話
，是需要生殖係統沒有任何問題發生的，尤其是子宮內膜的厚度對於懷孕也很關鍵。正常的子宮內膜厚度在二至八毫米之間 ，到了排卵時會增到十毫米 。但是有的女性子宮內膜16mm有血絲的情況 ，這就對
...[详细]
寶寶大便總是拉一點點是怎麽回事 ？
傣族的特色美食是什麽
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging