These days "the border" is used more as an inflammatory concept than an actual place with rules and laws. Now, the ACLU is trying to puncture that hot air with some help from the Constitution.
In preparation for a lawsuit the ACLU is bringing against the federal government, U.S. officials from Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had an under-oath chat with the ACLU about how exactly they search electronic devices at the border when they don't have a warrant or "suspicion."
SEE ALSO:Amazon must let shareholders have a say in selling of controversial facial recognition techThe ACLU reports that the testimony was revealing: Agents of these agencies can and do justify searching devices like laptops and cellphones for a variety of nebulous reasons not covered by the actual, ya know, law.
"CBP and ICE are asserting near-unfettered authority to search and seize travelers’ devices at the border, for purposes far afield from the enforcement of immigration and customs laws," the ACLU wrote in a blog post.
ICE and CBP have the authority to search the belongings of people entering the country for contraband, potentially breaking immigration law, and, of course, if they have a warrant. But the ACLU says these agencies are using "the border" as an excuse to skirt the privacy and speech protections enshrined by the Constitution.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the 'border' to make an end run around the Constitution," the ACLU writes. "The border is not a lawless place."
CBP and ICE representatives said that the agencies do not comment on pending litigation. ICE directed Mashable to CBP electronics search and seizure guidelines stating that "CBP searches the electronic devices of fewer than one-hundredth of 1 percent of all arriving international travelers."
"In this digital age, border searches of electronic devices are essential to enforcing the law at the U.S. border and to protecting the American people,” John Wagner, the CBP's deputy executive assistant commissioner, office of field operations, says in the guidelines. “CBP is committed to preserving the civil rights and civil liberties of those we encounter, including the small number of travelers whose devices are searched, which is why the updated Directive includes provisions above and beyond prevailing constitutional and legal requirements."
Beyond this statement by the CBP on its website, the ACLU reported that law enforcement officers admit that they search and seize devices for a host of reasons, which the ACLU says are beyond their direct jurisdiction. To name a few, agents said they will search devices to advance general law enforcement investigations (e.g., bankruptcy), at the request of another agency, or to get information about a contact of the owner of the device.
The ACLU claims these searches violate the first and fourth amendments. The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. For something that contains as much personal information as an electronic device, a search would typically require a warrant.
The first amendment protects against freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The ACLU says these searches may cause people to self-censor, so searches violate the first amendment. Additionally, some of the ACLU's clients on behalf of whom it is bringing the lawsuit are journalists. Searches of these individuals' devices — for information on their sources and reporting — might cause them to stop reporting out of fear.
Given these findings, the ACLU is asking the judge in its case to skip the trial and rule on behalf of its clients — U.S. citizens who have experienced unreasonable search and seizure. It wants the judge to send a message, that if a law enforcement officer wants to search a device, they need to get a warrant like everybody else.
UPDATE: May 1, 2019, 12:28 p.m. EDT
This article was updated to include a 'no comment' from ICE, as well as more information about the CBP's stance on electronic search procedures.
TopicsActivismCybersecurityPrivacyPoliticsImmigration
(责任编辑：時尚)
New Zealand designer's photo series celebrates the elegance of aging
Google will make it easier for kids and teens to remove photos from Google search
12 best tweets of the week, including Taco Bell, adult baby diaper driver, and Bingus
How to go live on TikTokEarly AppleThese glasses hide a fitness tracker on your face
The last time a company tried popularizing wearable tech embedded in glasses, most notably with Goog
...[详细]Apple makes it easier to find your lost AirPods Pro
Have no idea where you left your AirPods Pro? Apple's here to help. A firmware update (via MacRumors
...[详细]How to play podcasts on your Amazon Alexa
If you want to walk freely around your house listening to your podcasts on all your Alexa-enabled de
...[详细]How to edit your Bitmoji on Snapchat
If you designed a Bitmoji when they first debuted on Snapchat and never looked back, odds are the di
...[详细]How Hyperloop One went off the rails
In December 2014, an engineer with the unlikely name Brogan BamBrogan was in the driveway of his cla
...[详细]10 best people to follow if you want to learn how to be a farmer
If you've recently fantasized about quitting your desk job and living on a farm, you're not alone. F
...[详细]Samsung Galaxy S21 FE specs and pictures revealed in new leaks
Samsung's Galaxy S21 FE may be a little late, but it is coming, and now we know a little more about
...[详细]'The Forever Purge' sets up a killer idea for possible 'Purge 6'
The Fourth of July is a weird time for James DeMonaco. "It's become almost like 'Purge Day' in my li
...[详细]'Rocket League' Championship Series Season 2 offers $250,000 prize pool
Rocket League 。's competitive scene is just getting started. 。The 。 Rocket League 。Championship Series i
...[详细]Meet the designer who makes high
Welcome to Small Talk, a series where we catch up with the internet's favorite Extremely Online indi
...[详细]We asked linguists if Donald Trump speaks like that on purpose
Teens are apparently stealing soap dispensers and urinals from school for the devious lick trend
